RSS

Category Archives: writer’s group

My Circle, It Haz Essploded

The major thing that has changed in my life since I went to Clarion West is the people in my life. I think you’ll find that across the board, for the most part: you leave that sorority house not only loaded down with a gut full of knowledge (and a gut full of Joanie’s cooking) but with an address book full to bursting with awesomeness.

Before I went to CW I knew a few writers. I’d been to a few signings (what up Dan Wells!). I even went to a convention (where I felt lost and lonely, for the most part). I belonged to some critique groups, which had their own…problems. My literary circle was anemic. Mr. Eliza will attest, I complained often. The words “I want a writer friend!” were heard maybe too often around my house. It was tragic. I set things on fire. (Or maybe that was him, the memory grows smoky, harhar.)

Clarion West did three things, in the people field.

1- It introduced me to my fellow Westies, amazing people each and every one of them. (Now Mr. Eliza hears “I miss my writer friends!”)

2- It introduced me to authors who were both up and coming, and established, broadening my understanding of what it means to be a professional writer and underscoring the fact that this. Is. Possible.

3- It introduced me to my new IRL critique group, Horrific Miscue. Comprised of previous CW alumni, this is a well-organized, competent group that gives excellent critiques and supports one and another. (One of my issues with previous crit groups was…well, a lack of all three of those criteria.)

With that in mind, it pleases me to introduce all of you, my beautiful readers, to the Horrific Miscue blog. A bit quiet in the past, the blog is undergoing, as Cat Rambo says, Revitalizations! Members of the Horrific Miscue groups will post to the blog periodically with publishing updates, thoughts to think about and the like. I’ll be posting there on occasion, as well.

So add it to your blogroll and read it with your morning coffee or–better yet–midnight bourbon!

 
6 Comments

Posted by on February 29, 2012 in Clarion West, writer's group

 

You want critiques? I’ll GIVE you critiques…

I’ve got a beef. No, not beef, although I do have a lovely steak waiting for me at home.

I’ve got a peeve, an irritant, a horn in my proverbial paw. And it has to do with other writers.

Put yourself in this position: You’re in a group of writers who have gathered specifically to critique one another’s work, bringing unique perspectives and interesting ideas to the table. You walk in truly believing that each person there that submits a piece to be read is looking for honest feedback, with the goal to improve their work. Not an unlikely scenario, right?

And then you read a piece. It has X, Y and Z wrong with it, from your eyes. Too flat, too much info, no character intrigue, bad grammar, etc. Whatever the case may be. You offer your comments and discover that the other critiquers have found the same problems in the piece.

Now, if you were the author of said piece, wouldn’t that be a red flag? A sign to give this a critical look with these problems in mind?

Apparently not.

Especially if said writer has paid some wanton ‘professional’ to edit their work.

Yeah, I suppose if I paid a good deal of money to someone, expecting a particular result, I might be a bit defensive if I was told by a group of ‘nonprofessionals’ that I’d been ripped off.

Then again, maybe I’m way off base. Having seen an author in the above outlined situation come to the intractable defense of a poorly conceptualized piece of writing, it makes me irritated and confused. So…maybe my initial assumption that everyone was looking for a critique was misguided? Or maybe all the critiquers in this group weren’t seeing something that was so plain to the author, and we were all being silly.

Hmm…

Here’s my point- If you just want to show off, fine. There is plenty of room on the internet for that kind of thing. But if you’re going to actively see out constructive criticism for something you’ve done (be it writing, art, programming, etc.) be prepared to at least THINK about the comments you get.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on January 27, 2010 in writer's group

 

Tags: , , ,

Going to Writer’s group…

Last night I attended a meeting of a local writer’s group. I’ve gone a couple times before, but just kind of let it slide to the wayside while writing Struck By Chocolate. I tend not to go if I don’t have anything to critique, and I don’t want anyone critiquing something I haven’t givenat least a once over.

It’d be a little like someone going through my underwear drawer before I meet them for lunch. Someone who’s not my husband, that it.

(Okay, that sounded a little weird.)

Suffice it to say, it’s been a while.

Writer’s groups are interesting events, very roller coastery in their energy patters. You come in, sit down in your seat and place your work on your lap like a seat belt. Get ready kids…

A few introductions: Hi, hello, I remember your face but your name escapes me…I’ve never seen you before in my life…Oh, you again? Goodness…

Then the awkward moment before the first piece is passed around. Who goes first? Fumbling, mumbling, and finally we have a few sheets of paper to peruse, critique, trying to strike a balance between truth and harshness, compliments and sugary sap. And then we plunge into silence.

For the next ten, fifteen, twenty minutes all I hear are the sounds of papers flipping, pens scribbling, and the occasional snicker or heavy sigh. For the author, this time can range from excruciating, to excruciatingly boring.

Mostly I’m just bored.

I can’t wait to dig into the thoughts these people have about my work, see what struck them, what rang false, what just. Didn’t. Work.

And, following along with my impatient tendencies, I want it all NOW.

But, since this is reality I’m dealing with, I have to wait. And as I’m waiting I read through my manuscript, finding the inevitable errors. I have the urge to say things like “Page three? First paragraph? Yeah, that should say walked on water, not talked to water.” Or “His name is Andy, not Candy. Sorry about that.”

But I don’t. For the most part at least. I just mutter low obscenities and circle sore thumbs just as much as my fellow critiquers.

Then, once everyone has reached the last page, the room erupts in opinions, fast talking, and a good deal of interruption. Everybody has something to say, and since writing is often such a subjective art in terms of minor quibbles, so much of what is said will conflict.

That’s just the way it is.

If I were to take every bit of advice to heart, it would make me go utterly batty. Utterly. And there are enough other things to push me toward that end as it is.

All in all the group is great. I do get some very valuable feedback (which helped me whit A Kind Of Death into shape for the WOtF contest), and not an insubstantial bit of inspiration. But it takes a strong backbone, and a stronger stomach.

Because it’s hard to stand up for what you believe in, and even harder to swallow the truth of a mistake.

But that’s what makes us stronger, as writers and as people.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on January 20, 2010 in writer's group

 

Tags: , ,

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 147 other followers